Comments for KB Research http://blog.kbresearch.nl Research at the National Library of the Netherlands Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:42:50 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.2 Comment on Policy-based assessment of EPUB with Epubcheck by Nat http://blog.kbresearch.nl/2015/03/13/policy-based-assessment-of-epub-with-epubcheck/#comment-54 Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:42:50 +0000 https://researchkb.wordpress.com/?p=1129#comment-54 Great post, we might follow some of these rules! For the audio and video we are thinking of comparing MediaTypes from Epubcheck output and compare it to our specified allowed mediatypes (audio, video and else wont be there) and then accept only those without audio, video etc.
And how would you make the rule for external references to audio and video? Because they are reported in References (Epubcheck output) as simple references in the document. And we dont want to disallow all this references just references to audio and video. Still investigating this.

]]>
Comment on 10 Tips for making your OCR project succeed by tri http://blog.kbresearch.nl/2013/12/12/10-tips-for-making-your-ocr-project-succeed/#comment-24 Thu, 04 May 2017 10:20:56 +0000 http://researchkb.wordpress.com/?p=374#comment-24 I am not an programmer but I want to study about OCR algorithm. What is the best book/ article that explain about OCR in detail (from basic to expert)? Thank you

]]>
Comment on Bridging the gap between quantitative and qualitative research in digital newspaper archives by Feminist Data Visualization, SelfieCity & Other Links – Digital Humanities 2.0 http://blog.kbresearch.nl/2017/01/25/bridging-the-gap/#comment-92 Wed, 01 Feb 2017 21:26:35 +0000 http://blog.kbresearch.nl/?p=2061#comment-92 […] Bridging the Gap Between Quantitative & Qualitative Research […]

]]>
Comment on DH Clinics – librarians unite! by lottewilms http://blog.kbresearch.nl/2016/11/11/dh-clinics-librarians-unite/#comment-91 Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:49:24 +0000 http://blog.kbresearch.nl/?p=2005#comment-91 Thank you, copy/pasting mistake :) I’ve changed it in the text!

]]>
Comment on DH Clinics – librarians unite! by Mateusz Kuzak http://blog.kbresearch.nl/2016/11/11/dh-clinics-librarians-unite/#comment-90 Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:46:22 +0000 http://blog.kbresearch.nl/?p=2005#comment-90 This is a great initiative. Thank you.
The Library Carpentry link points to Programming Historian page. You can either link to LC web page hosted on github https://librarycarpentry.github.io or the twitter account @LibCarpentry.

]]>
Comment on Call for proposals KB Researcher-in-residence 2017 by postdoc programmes: archives 2016 | postgraduate opportunities in archaeology http://blog.kbresearch.nl/2016/06/08/call-for-proposals-kb-researcher-in-residence-2017/#comment-89 Thu, 01 Sep 2016 07:37:36 +0000 http://blog.kbresearch.nl/?p=1798#comment-89 […] Digital Humanities team and KB data. In return, we learn how researchers use the data of the KB. http://blog.kbresearch.nl/2016/06/08/call-for-proposals-kb-researcher-in-residence-2017/ Closing date: 31 August […]

]]>
Comment on Call for proposals KB Researcher-in-residence 2017 by Call for proposals KB Researcher-in-residence 2017 – deadline 31 August | DIGHUMLAB http://blog.kbresearch.nl/2016/06/08/call-for-proposals-kb-researcher-in-residence-2017/#comment-88 Fri, 08 Jul 2016 12:38:46 +0000 http://blog.kbresearch.nl/?p=1798#comment-88 […] More details, form, terms and conditions can be found here […]

]]>
Comment on Policy-based assessment of EPUB with Epubcheck by Johan van der Knijff http://blog.kbresearch.nl/2015/03/13/policy-based-assessment-of-epub-with-epubcheck/#comment-53 Fri, 13 May 2016 13:48:41 +0000 https://researchkb.wordpress.com/?p=1129#comment-53 Good point. The main concern here would be externally referenced audiovisual content in EPUB 3. Looking back at the blog it does seem a bit odd we didn’t explicitly address this (although none of the publishers we’re dealing with at the moment use A/V content, and the vast majority still supply EPUB 2). But this may well change in the future, so I think we should add a rule for this. Thanks for pointing this out!

]]>
Comment on Policy-based assessment of EPUB with Epubcheck by Théophile Naito http://blog.kbresearch.nl/2015/03/13/policy-based-assessment-of-epub-with-epubcheck/#comment-52 Fri, 13 May 2016 10:16:04 +0000 https://researchkb.wordpress.com/?p=1129#comment-52 Thank you for your interesting posts.
It seems that KB doesn’t reject files with external references.
Since external references aren’t good from a preservation perspective, could you possibly explain why KB’s policy doesn’t include this concern?

]]>
Comment on The future of EPUB? A first look at the EPUB 3.1 Editor’s draft by Johan van der Knijff http://blog.kbresearch.nl/2016/03/10/the-future-of-epub-a-first-look-at-the-epub-3-1-editors-draft/#comment-83 Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:33:10 +0000 http://blog.kbresearch.nl/?p=1666#comment-83 Thanks for getting back to this Matt. It didn’t escape my attention that the draft is intentionally provocative in places, and I agree this is an excellent way to poke people for feedback. I also like the use of Github issues for the review process, this makes everything really transparent while at the same time keeping the barriers for participating low. In an earlier draft of my blog post I actually mentioned these things in the final section, but that part of the blog didn’t make the final cut (I originally aimed for a 1000 word piece and went way over that!). The NCX sticks out as one of the biggies to me, so I’m curious about the outcome of that.

]]>